Phone call after phone call, text after text, I am compelled to write a blog in response to the impact of the COVID19 virus on the world of philanthropy. As a professional fundraising consultant, I’m drawn to thinking about philanthropy at large in order to deduce solutions to the situation.
National Philanthropic Homeostasis: The ratio of philanthropic dollars as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) has not moved since it was first recorded in 1971; come feast or famine, donations account for 2% of GDP in the USA. It’s stubborn, says the Chronicle of Philanthropy, check out the charts, facts and figures here. The good news: we are consistent with our giving, at large, and seem to be *relatively* untethered to any financial climb or crisis.
Today’s Anxiety: Like the Economic Great Recession that began in 2008, nonprofits are in panic mode as a moratorium has been mandated on meetings in major metropolises. Two reasons:
Quick Tangent: Nonprofit organizations play a vital role in building healthy communities by providing critical services that contribute to economic stability and mobility. They are recognized as such by the government because they are doing the work the government would otherwise do, but is not able / willing to; therefore, they receive tax exemptions, employee protection and 501(c)3 status. Nonprofit organizations work for public good rather than financial gain like a private business. There are no fat-cats benefiting in the form of profits or dividends from the sidelines for this work. In other words: anyone who is benefitting financially is gainfully employed through the nonprofit rather than sitting as a shareholder.
That doesn’t mean they should be operating with the scarcity model that many donors (and third party “overhead” evaluators) perpetuate!!! What happens with funding suddenly slows? The nonprofit beneficiaries are at major risk. This is neither sustainable nor prudent. IMHO, nonprofits should have high enough overhead to recruit and retain talent and tech, as any other business would. They should develop funds for iterative innovation and discovery. And they should accumulate reserves for times of financial downturn. Watch this iconic Ted Talk by Dan Pallotta: The way we think about charity is dead wrong.
My Curiosity: I wonder if now is the time to turn philanthropy on its head. Insert feel good adage about how hard times bring positive growth… Perhaps we can find some alternative ways of fundraising as a response to the changing times.
The Problem with Charity Events: One friend called today and told me her clients are concerned because events have been cancelled and that is a place where many fundraisers connect with their donors to provide “moves management” like stewardship and cultivation – not to mention ask for money. Another organization said their program is showcased at their gala and now donors won’t see it or feel inspired to give. What I hear in these stories, among many others, is that nonprofits are counting on events to do the two most important elements of their fundraising job: fortify relationships and demonstrate impact. My training is largely centered on Major / Transformational Giving and Capital Campaigns and with thanks to nearly a decade of accounts across the country with the powerhouse of CCS Fundraising. Although I love events, they serve a purpose of building community, delighting the donor and acquiring new potential supporters. They should not be the primary source of donor engagement or impact demonstration.
The Solution: The challenge is to get less dependent on big, one-time, annual events. That means building long term relationships with philanthropists but also with foundations and corporations who support your organization with reserve funding, endowments, and discretionary funds. The focus of fundraising should be on integrating major gifts, multi-year, funding partnership strategies. Until then, below are actions you can take right away to stay afloat.
Other ideas? Send them my way! Email me at [email protected]